PAR Guide to the 2016 Constitutional Amendments – very important information

parlogo

See Guide below

Voters statewide will be asked to decide yes or no on six proposed amendments to the Louisiana Constitution on the November 8, 2016, ballot. Amendments 2, 3 and 5 are particularly significant because of their impact on state policy. They address who will set college tuition levels, the rate and deductions for corporate income taxes and a new trust fund to address state revenue surges.

This PAR Guide to the 2016 Constitutional Amendments provides a review of each item in the order they will appear on the ballot. The Guide is educational and does not recommend how to vote. It offers concise analysis and provides arguments of proponents and opponents.

These proposals were passed during the first special session and the regular legislative session earlier this year. Each bill received at least a two-thirds vote in the House of Representatives and in the Senate and now needs a majority vote at the polls as required for passage of constitutional amendments. The governor cannot veto proposals for constitutional amendments.

A constitution is supposed to be a state’s fundamental law that contains the essential elements of government organization, the basic principles of governmental powers and the enumeration of citizen rights. A constitution is meant to have permanence. Statutory law, on the other hand, provides the details of government operation and is subject to frequent change by the Legislature. Typically, constitutional amendments are proposed to authorize new programs, ensure that reforms are not easily undone by future legislation or seek protections for special interests. Unfortunately, as more detail is placed in the Constitution, more amendments may be required when conditions change or problems arise with earlier provisions.

Since its implementation in 1974, the Louisiana Constitution has been amended 183 times. Louisiana has a long history of frequent constitutional changes. Special interests often demand constitutional protection for favored programs to avoid future legislative interference, resulting in numerous revenue dedications and trust fund provisions. The concept of the constitution as a relatively permanent statement of basic law fades with the adoption of many amendments.

Through the House Committee on Civil Law and Procedure, the Legislature tries to make certain that each proposed amendment does, in fact, need to be posed to voters. The Legislature also has tried to make it easier for voters to determine what a given amendment would do if approved by requiring that the ballot language be written in a “clear, concise and unbiased” manner and that it be phrased in the form of a question.

Voters must do their part as well. In order to develop informed opinions about the proposed amendments, they must evaluate each one carefully and make a decision based on its merits. One important consideration should always be whether the proposed language belongs in the Constitution.

constitutional-amendments-2016_rev1constitutional-amendments-2016_rev33constitutional-amendments-2016_rev34constitutional-amendments-2016_rev35constitutional-amendments-2016_rev36constitutional-amendments-2016_rev37constitutional-amendments-2016_rev38constitutional-amendments-2016_rev39constitutional-amendments-2016_rev40constitutional-amendments-2016_rev41constitutional-amendments-2016_rev42constitutional-amendments-2016_rev43constitutional-amendments-2016_rev44constitutional-amendments-2016_rev45constitutional-amendments-2016_rev46constitutional-amendments-2016_rev47constitutional-amendments-2016_rev48constitutional-amendments-2016_rev49constitutional-amendments-2016_rev50constitutional-amendments-2016_rev51

Leave a Reply